There is no legal right to a four-day working week in the UK. Employees can make a day-one flexible working request under the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023, but employers can refuse it on statutory grounds. The 2022 UK pilot showed strong results for knowledge-work businesses, but the model is not universally applicable. Any switch requires a contractual change agreed with the employee.
The two models: compressed vs reduced hours
Before getting into the evidence and the law, it is worth being precise about what "four-day week" actually means, because the term covers two very different arrangements:
The distinction matters legally because a compressed arrangement does not change the employee's contracted hours and therefore does not trigger any change to pay or most statutory entitlements. A reduced-hours arrangement does change contracted hours and requires a formal contractual variation agreed between employer and employee.
Most public debate and most of the research evidence concerns the reduced-hours model. When people say "the four-day week works", they typically mean the reduced-hours version.
What the 2022 UK trial found
In 2022, the UK ran one of the largest real-world trials of a reduced-hours four-day working week. The trial was coordinated by 4 Day Week Global in partnership with the Autonomy thinktank and researchers from Cambridge University and Boston College in the United States.
Who took part
Sixty-one UK companies with approximately 2,900 workers participated. The pilot ran from June to December 2022. Companies kept their workers on 100% of their normal pay while reducing their contracted working time to 80%, with the goal of achieving 100% of previous productivity through better focus, reduced unproductive time, and restructured work processes.
What the researchers found
Results were published in February 2023. According to the researchers' report:
- 92% of participating companies decided to continue with the four-day week after the trial ended, with 18 confirming a permanent switch immediately
- Revenue across the cohort grew on average during the trial period compared with the same period the previous year
- Reported sickness absence and staff turnover both fell significantly among participating companies
- Employee scores on burnout, fatigue, life satisfaction and mental health all improved over the six months
- No significant negative effect on output was measured at a group level
International context
The UK trial was part of a wider global programme. Parallel pilots in Ireland, the United States, Australia, New Zealand and Canada ran in the same period and reported broadly similar results. Iceland had run an earlier public sector pilot (2015 to 2019) covering more than 2,500 workers, with findings that included maintained or improved productivity and significant improvements in worker wellbeing. Portugal launched a government-sponsored pilot in 2023.
Where things stand in 2026
As of June 2026, there is no government mandate and no legislation requiring or specifically enabling a four-day working week in the UK. The Labour government that came to power in July 2024 did not include a four-day week mandate in the Employment Rights Act 2025, which focused on zero-hours contracts, fire and rehire practices, trade union rights and unfair dismissal protections.
What has changed is the voluntary adoption rate. A number of large and medium-sized UK employers have permanently shifted to a four-day week following their participation in or observation of the 2022 trial. Tech companies, professional services firms, marketing agencies and some charities have led the change. In sectors where the model does not fit operationally, adoption has been minimal.
Employee awareness and interest has increased. More employees are making flexible working requests specifically to move to a four-day schedule. Employers receiving these requests need to understand both what the law requires and what a proper assessment of the arrangement involves.
The legal position for employees and employers
There is no right to a four-day week
The Working Time Regulations 1998 cap the average working week at 48 hours for most workers (with a voluntary opt-out available). They set the minimum rest and leave entitlements. They say nothing about the minimum number of days an employee must work, so there is no statutory floor below which an employer cannot require fewer days. A four-day week is entirely lawful; it is also not a right.
Flexible working requests
The most relevant legal route for an employee who wants to move to a four-day week is a flexible working request. The Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 amended the right significantly:
| Rule | Before April 2024 | From 6 April 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Who can request | Employees with 26 weeks' continuous service | All employees from day one |
| How many requests per year | One | Two |
| Response deadline | 3 months | 2 months |
| Consultation requirement | Required if refusing | Required before any decision |
Crucially, a flexible working request is not a right to the arrangement requested. The employer must consider the request properly and consult with the employee, but can refuse it on any of eight statutory business grounds:
- The burden of additional costs
- Detrimental effect on ability to meet customer demand
- Inability to reorganise work among existing staff
- Inability to recruit additional staff
- Detrimental impact on quality
- Detrimental impact on performance
- Insufficiency of work during the proposed hours
- Planned structural changes to the business
An employer does not need to prove the ground beyond doubt, but it must be genuinely applicable. A blanket refusal without proper consideration is an employment law risk. Employees can appeal internally and can ultimately bring a claim to an Employment Tribunal if dismissed or subjected to a detriment for making the request.
Changing an existing contract
If an employer decides to introduce a four-day week, it requires a formal variation of contract for each affected employee. This must be agreed: an employer cannot unilaterally reduce an employee's contracted hours without their consent (that would be a breach of contract and potentially an unlawful deduction from wages if pay is reduced). The variation should be documented in writing and signed by both parties. If existing employment contracts are silent on the number of working days, take employment law advice on how to document the change.
Annual leave on a four-day week
Annual leave entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998 is expressed in weeks (5.6 weeks for most employees, with a maximum of 28 days for a five-day-a-week worker). Moving to a four-day week changes how the days figure is calculated.
A full-time employee working five days a week has a statutory entitlement of 5.6 weeks, which equals 28 days (5 x 5.6). If the same employee moves to a four-day week, their statutory entitlement in days falls to 22.4 days (4 x 5.6). Pay stays the same if this is a reduced-hours arrangement with maintained pay, but the days figure changes.
The same logic applies to bank holidays. If an employee works Monday to Thursday, Good Friday does not fall on a day they would normally work and does not need to be given as paid leave (or deducted from their allowance). If they work Tuesday to Friday, Easter Monday creates the same position. This can require rethinking bank holiday treatment for individual employees. For a detailed guide to bank holiday policy options, see the bank holiday policy guide.
When an employee moves to a four-day week, their annual leave allowance in days changes. Book Time Off lets you set a custom allowance for each person independently: update one employee's entitlement to 22.4 days without touching anyone else's. Days used and days remaining update automatically from there.
Try it free →Is it right for your business?
The honest answer to this question depends heavily on what your business does. The 2022 UK trial was dominated by professional services, technology, marketing and knowledge-work businesses where output is measured by results rather than hours present. For those sectors, the model has a plausible mechanism: reduce unproductive time (unnecessary meetings, context-switching, interruptions), maintain focus on real output, and give employees a longer recovery window.
| Sector / business type | Suitability | Key consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Office-based professional services, tech, marketing, finance, creative | High, if output is measurable and meetings can be reduced | Requires genuine reorganisation of work, not just compressing the same schedule |
| Retail, hospitality, customer-facing with contracted service hours | Low for reduced-hours model; compressed may work for some roles | Physical presence is directly tied to service delivery; fewer days means less coverage or higher headcount cost |
| Healthcare, care services | Low for reduced-hours; shift-pattern adjustments may be more relevant | Staffing ratios and patient care standards constrain schedule flexibility at the business level |
| Manufacturing, logistics | Depends on process; some lines can adapt, others cannot | Machine utilisation and production schedules may require continuous operation regardless of individual working patterns |
| Mixed teams (some roles eligible, others not) | Partial implementation possible, with care | Creates two-tier treatment within the same business; fairness and resentment risks need managing explicitly |
Partial implementations, where some roles can adopt a four-day week and others cannot, are common but require careful management. The risk of resentment between teams where one group has a different schedule is real and should be acknowledged openly rather than ignored.
How to run a trial
For employers who have assessed the suitability question and want to test the model, running a structured trial before making a permanent change is strongly advisable. The 2022 UK cohort's near-universal continuation rate reflects in part that they ran proper trials rather than permanent switches.
When different team members work different patterns, keeping leave entitlements, allowances and approvals consistent gets complicated fast on a shared spreadsheet. Book Time Off handles custom per-person allowances, leave type tracking and one-click approvals across the whole team, regardless of working pattern. Staggered four-day arrangements, mixed full-time and part-time teams, and individual flexible working agreements all work in one place.
Try it free →Sources and further reading
| GOV.UK | Flexible working: the right to request and employers' duty to consider (GOV.UK) |
| ACAS | Flexible working guidance for employers (ACAS) |
| legislation.gov.uk | Working Time Regulations 1998 |
| legislation.gov.uk | Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 |
| legislation.gov.uk | Employment Rights Act 1996, s.80F (flexible working right as amended) |
| 4 Day Week Global / Cambridge University / Boston College / Autonomy | The results of the 2022 UK six-month pilot were published in February 2023 in a report co-authored by researchers from Cambridge University and Boston College in partnership with the Autonomy thinktank. This is a research source, not a government publication; figures are drawn from self-reported employer data and independent researcher observation during the trial period. |